Think Before You Buy 4G

If there is any single truth about modern life, it is the fact that our smart devices just keep getting more powerful. As the devices get more powerful, they develop a hunger for more bandwidth and bigger chunks of data. Of course, the good news is that our devices do more for us than ever before, and they serve us in ways that seem to increase daily. But we have to pay the price.

That price is in service from a data provider and from any of the major carriers available in the area. Currently the majority of users buy data at 3G speeds, and they don’t usually think about how much data they get for the money – it is after all 3G, a standard that is clearly defined by the International Telecommunications Union (ITU). And the “G” stands for “generation”, so you would think that going from 3G to 4G would be a no-brainer, right? The standards are defined by the ITU, and it is the next logical generation of mobile data capability.

Not as Advertised

But not all is as it seems when it comes to wireless carriers and 4G. In fact, things are downright shifty. Take, for example, AT&T’s 4G network. The big change in AT&T’s network is in, you ready for this – the name. Apparently some executives at the AT&T marketing department decided that 4G would sell better than lowly 3G, so AT&T was born.

Now, the network that AT&T runs is HSPA-plus, but as early as September this was their 3G network. Since then AT&T has a big new slogan – “The nation’s fastest mobile broadband network” – and a big new 4G sign on their website. When new AT&T phones roll out this year, you can expect 4G to be prominently displayed. Now, AT&T is spending a lot of money to put Long-Term Evolution (LTE) in place ahead of its original 2013 schedule, but customers will not see a difference until that time.

AT&T is not the only carrier to re-brand their current 3G network as 4G, and in fact, they are not even the first. Earlier T-Mobile USA, who uses the same HSPA-plus technology as AT&T, re-branded themselves as a 4G network. The ads that soon followed bragged on their 4G technology at the expense of other carriers, particularly AT&T. Ironic, isn’t it?

Especially when T-Mobile’s new ad is “America’s Largest 4G Network”, which it isn’t no matter how you try to define it. In fact, while AT&T has plans to roll out LTE, T-Mobile has no immediate plans in the works. The only advantage they have is in the short term, being the first to rebrand their existing HSPA-plus 3G network.

The 4G Description Loophole

But how can wireless carriers so easily rebrand existing technologies as 4G, when the ITU is defining exactly what makes 4G. Well, therein lies the rub – there isn’t a firm definition as to what exactly makes up 4G. The group is working to formalize one, but in the meanwhile (last December, to be more exact), they gave the go ahead for the branding of advanced 3G as 4G. And the carriers jumped at the chance.

Will the Real 4G Stand Up

In the meanwhile, Verizon and Sprint have products that could be considered real 4G technologies. Sprint has a 2 year head start with rolling out its WiMax technology to customers, and Verizon rolled out LTE in December. Both of these technologies are superior to HSPA-plus (which, as you remember, was originally branded as 3G).

Caveat Emptor

When it comes to 4G, the consumer is left bewildered and unsure of exactly what they are buying into. As it is, the expectation of what speeds should be 4G is as fuzzy as the 4G definition itself. So what should a buyer expect?

The best advice at this time is for the consumer to not put a lot of weight into the 4G tag, especially when it comes to AT&T and T-Mobile. When these networks get around to rolling out their advanced products, hopefully sometimes in 2012 for AT&T, then perhaps it may mean something. Until then, don’t let expectations of the 4G label rope you into new contracts or expectations. Especially when it comes to new contracts, which may even extend far enough to make the 4G claim eventually real. It’s nice of you to foot the cost up front.

  12 comments for “Think Before You Buy 4G

  1. negativefx
    January 24, 2011 at 2:15 pm

    I don’t care what you call it, 8mbps+ on Sprint is 4G-enough for me at the moment.

  2. ScottM
    January 24, 2011 at 3:02 pm

    Is this a joke?? HSPA (3G) is indeed different, and slower, then the new HSPA+ (4G) that they’re upgrading to. To use your word, it’s the HSPA+ is the next “generation” of HSPA technogoly. You could atleast include some actual fact to make your case that its the same old technology. For instance – HSPA standards include 14mb/s down while HSPA+ standards include 56mb/s down. Clearly and upgrade in speed. Yes, I will agree to your point that they’re re-branding 3G to 4g… but they are actually upgrading the service as well. You’re making it sound as though there’s no difference.

  3. January 24, 2011 at 4:13 pm

    First, these technologies are all classified by the ITU as being 4g technologies (though I am aware the IEEE standard was out first, we’re referring to nontechnical nomenclature)

    Furthermore, just to reiterate what ScottM has already said:
    The HSPA+ network that T Mobile has set up (and now ATT) is much faster than the old 3g network. Most users see at least a doubling in speed.

    In fact, as far as standards go, the wimax and lte standards are just as ‘not 4g’ as hspa+ is.

    I remember, years ago, when T Mobile was rapidly building its new towers, it touted the fact that they had put in next generation equipment so that when the HSPA+ firmware was finalized a quick upload would mean that everyone on their network would be a generation ahead of the competition.

    What we are seeing is indeed a significant increase in wireless performance, especially in bandwidth strained areas. To call the companies liars because their use of a moniker to represent a significant upgrade is not the name universally accepted is a bit pedantic. Especially when they have been universally using the same terminology for the past 5 years and I’m pretty sure that it is the only definition of 4g that most consumers are aware.

  4. January 24, 2011 at 4:33 pm

    I stopped reading after I read “…they develop a hunger for more bandwidth and bigger chunks of data.”

  5. PhilB
    January 24, 2011 at 6:29 pm

    Umm… my htc Touch (Sprint) phone works sure works better/faster than the iPhone it replaced. I’m happy.

  6. Jgregc
    January 24, 2011 at 6:31 pm

    Okay, so AT&T and T-Mobile are marketing it as 4G, charging it as it were 4G, but it is not 4G. That is simply not right. It’s not a question of “Faster” or “incremental” – it is simply not being honest with the customer. There are no fuzzy lines of thought here, except for the misdirection the wireless carriers are casting.

    Next up will be the lie that they are offering you access to the internet through wireless – instead what they will soon be giving you is a prioritized internet with some areas roped off and others so low prioritized that access will be useless. This is just part one of the lie.

    • Jgregc
      January 24, 2011 at 6:37 pm

      Of course I am referring to the 4G standard set up by the IEEE, not the label change…

    • Enkay Nk
      January 25, 2011 at 1:13 am

      Yeah, you are an example of an uninformed consumer. at&t is not charging any more than they were before. I do feel that the author targets at&t when really it was t-mo that did this first. I think at&t was just responding to the fact that t-mobile is full of it.

      here is a tip, do some actual research on this stuff then talk. not the other way around.

      • Jgregc
        January 25, 2011 at 4:24 am

        Erm, I didn’t say they were charging more, just the illusion of giving a certain product when that is clearly not the case.

        Here is a tip – read AND understand the comment before replying…

  7. January 25, 2011 at 5:42 am

    So when real 4G becomes available, will they call it 5G?

  8. Mksaji
    March 16, 2011 at 7:09 am

    Speed/bandwidth of 100mbps perhaps can be classified as 4G, be it which ever technology deployment…

  9. June 6, 2012 at 10:27 am

    it’s my mean that in present time every one has required  4g because that has more speed than 3g.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.